253 out of 279 people found the following comment useful :- Whoa! This is more like it!, 29 September 2005
Author:
sarastro7 from Denmark
After being disappointed by mediocre to bad new shows like Threshold
and Invasion, I am glad that there's at least one new show that really
delivers. Supernatural is in a whole different league, with proper
style, suspense and great production values. This is a
dark, moody show that understands how to use the television medium. The
story isn't exactly complex, but the storytelling technique pulls you
in and holds your attention, making you want to know more about the
supernatural beings and the rules that govern their shadow world. I'm
usually not a fan of darkness and horror, but this show is effective.
It's dark urban fantasy and it has the potential to go a long way.
As it is, the show is way, waay above average, and I rate the pilot
episode an 8 out of 10.
248 out of 272 people found the following comment useful :- Supernatural is a dream for everyone who loves the horror/suspense genre, 20 September 2005
Author:
Kimberly from United States
I personally have been waiting to see a show based on spooky plots and
this show delivers. Supernatural is somewhat endearing in that the main
characters (the only ones who will be recurring) are brothers, however,
the writing makes the characters more believable. They are different
from each other, each with their own take on life and things that are
not typical. I think as the show goes on it will continue to get
better,though it is great now. I can't wait to see more of this show!
Another plus is the little bits of humor placed here and there, which,
when done right, is always a plus. Some of the best shows/movies are
ones in which one minute you are sitting on the edge of your seat
biting your nails and the next you are laughing at some irony or funny
statement/joke a character has said. Also, having two very attractive
men in the cast doesn't hurt, either ;)
253 out of 282 people found the following comment useful :- One word: Awesome, 17 September 2005
Author:
TruthIsOutThere from United States
During the 90's I was a big fan of the X-Files to this day I still am.
The X-Files had great stories and character development, which is
needed for a great show. Supernatural has that from the very first
episode. I admit that I missed the first 10 minutes of the show, but I
knew exactly what happened and where the story was going. Most shows
you tune into after the first few minutes your lost and you lose
interest, unlike Supernatural. CBS's Threshold, may not live up to the
X-Files, but Supernatural does.
One final note, as long as the WB doesn't do any tweaking of the show
this series will last for quite a few seasons.
155 out of 202 people found the following comment useful :- amazing.........totally awesome, 13 September 2005
Author:
cool_imran89 from vancouver,canada
When i first saw the trailer of the show, i didn't actually get it. But
now that i have seen it i completely get it. I understood completely
about the entire story. I didn't know that they(cast) can tell
everything that has happened in just 1 hour. Jensen Ackles again did an
amazing job for the WB. He had a background of Kansas, which is ironic
because he was in Kansas in another hit WB show Smallville. He played
the older brother who kind of taking care of his younger brother played
by Jared Padalecki. Jared's character was tired of hunting supernatural
things. but when his own girlfriend dies the same way his mom died, he
decided to hunt that thing. This all happened in the pilot episode.
Both brothers are also looking for their father who hasn't returned to
them in days. He was on his hunting trip( looking for the thing that
killed his wife). This also happened in the pilot episode. I don't know
if the time or day of the airing of the show will be changed, but i
will watch it every week. The WB has made a wise decision of picking up
this show. I recommend to everyone to watch this show. You wont be
sorry.
124 out of 154 people found the following comment useful :- Supergood naturally, 18 April 2006
Author:
boo_4ever from Ireland
Supernatural is gonna draw the obvious X Files comparisons so we might
as well get them out of the way now. Its stars are an intrepid duo who
travel across America encountering all manner of paranormal phenomena
and mythological creatures. It has a lot of ex-files staff too which is
apparent if you have watch both shows pretty closely.
Supernatural isn't as smart as The X Files , nor is it as cleverly
written. The X Files was ahead of the time in many ways and is still
unique in others, in that it was a mature drama which took its subject
matter very seriously. It managed to blend sci fi and the paranormal
skillfully so that you almost didn't notice the seams. Supernatural in
a way is like The X Files - lite. It knows what it is and I think is a
more focused show then its predecessor. From the get go it lays it out
to you that it is situated in a world where ghosts, demons and witches
really do exist. Once that is established its on with the show and
there is no looking back whereas the X Files constantly had the viewer
questioning and thinking about what he was seeing and hearing. Where
The X Files was the thinking mans science paper, Supernatural is a camp
fire ghost story.
Which is more then fine by me. As a lover of ghost stories myself
Supernatural makes for fantastic viewing. Its strongest points are its
atmosphere and visual imagery. The storyline surrounding the brothers
relationship to their father and to each other is in its fledgling
stages and will no doubt become stronger over time. Already though it
is fun to watch the interplay between Dean and Sam. being the older
brother in a family of two myself I find myself sympathising with Dean.
Not just because of that but also because I find his personality
something I can relate to. His is very Mulder-like in his often
whimsical approach to situations. The other brother Sam I find
downright annoying at times with the overplayed teen angst.
As for the story lines themselves this is Supernaturals weakest point.
So far in the first series Supernatural has a basic structure which
rarely changes - brothers drive into town, weird things (usually
deaths) happen, brothers use fake ID's to find out about the demon /
witch / ghost just in time to save the Hot Chick of the Week(tm) wash,
rinse, repeat. If it continues Supernatural is in danger of burning out
real fast. However in latter episodes there looks to be some sort of
mythology developing which should hopefully complicate things. The
fathers connection to their mothers death, Sams visions, the Meg demon
etc.
Having just criticised the story lines I have to admit I love their
themes. Each week focuses on a different legend such as the woman in
white, bloody mary, vampires etc. Each handled very well and with a
surprising amount of knowledge. You can tell that ghost story telling
is a real labour of love for the creators. It also introduces a lot of
lesser known legends such as the wendigo, shrika etc. Someone is doing
their homework and I cant wait to see what creatures appear in later
episodes. The references to other supernatural shows such as the x
files and ghostbusters is an added treat for fans of the genre. As is
the classic rock soundtrack. My god someone has taste. Its like they
reached into my mind and put down all my favourite past times on
celluloid. Well the ones that can be viewed by under 18's anyway. I
wouldn't say Supernatural has "made scary sexy". I would say its made
scary cool again. If only I could be cool again too. Maybe I would be
if I had a Chevy Impala too.
All in all an excellent new series dripping with humour, atmosphere and
chills. Here's to series two!
105 out of 130 people found the following comment useful :- This show serves it's purpose, with grace!, 23 October 2005
Author:
Josh Hatfield (wr17joshua@vfs.com) from United States
Now this show is not without problems. I'll be the first to admit it.
It's very basic premise and sometimes convenient plot turns are not
lost on me. Two monster hunting brothers travel cross country and
extinguish a different monster each week. Not too much on the original
side, I know. However, I can't help but watch this show every week with
a fondness for my old junior high days. For those who don't know I was
a huge sci-if/horror geek in my younger years and I loved reading about
"The Crazy Hook Man who kills Teenagers" or "The Ghost of the Lady in
White". I ate those stories up, and apparently so did the show's
creator. This show takes me back to the years before I learned what
character arcs, and plot contrivances were. It strips that all away and
just lets me enjoy what it was like to hear ghost stories. What it was
like to get chills down my spine every time I rode down a dark road at
night expecting an apparition in white to appear. What it was like to
come so close to saying "Bloody Mary" to the mirror and then passing
out. There is a likability to this show that can't be ignored, and
there's even some great moments with the two main characters Sam and
Dean (played quite well by Padalecki and Ackles) but it is that
nostalgic feeling above all that brings me back each week.
100 out of 121 people found the following comment useful :- Excellent Show, 16 October 2005
Author:
Bigprisc (LamCui@hotmail.com) from Singapore
I just want to say that I noticed the show because I am a big big fan
of Sarah Shahi. And watched the pilot for the same reason. But I am
sure glad I did, because I became hooked to it and wished the episodes
would come out sooner.
I hate horror/ghost shows, movies or TV. I am just a chicken at heart
and cannot stand being spooked. But this show is really refreshing as
it does not go for cheap thrills like in so many other horror shows.
Instead, it explores the different themes and urban legends. Yes, it
might sound clichéd. But it is really interesting for me that they
explored the different legends.
The best part is, I can sit thru the whole entire show without haven't
my guts jump out at every turn.
True that they need to feature less teen beautiful girls. But at least
it doesn't play out like other shows that the leads get to wine, dine
and bed the girls in different episodes. Contrary, it is very
refreshing to see a show that does not have a boy-girl relationship
going on.
I like the writing of the story, it is paced pretty well. I also like
the acting, easy and comfortable. But what grabs me most is the high
production value they have. great shots and great lighting.
One bad point though... the special effects could be a lot better. And
the editor has to take note that the blue screens still can be spotted.
Please do a cleaner job in taking out the blue screens.
I like to end saying that I love Sarah Shahi even more now. Because she
has led me to a show that is totally worth watching.
91 out of 112 people found the following comment useful :- Excellent beginning, 18 September 2005
Author:
djean60 from United States
I wasn't sure this was going to be a "must see" for me, but the
atmospheric lighting, outstanding writing and acting had me from the
first.
It doesn't hurt that veteran X-Files director was in charge of the
pilot.
Steve Railsback (X-Files' Duane Berry) was seen briefly as the haunted
husband of the ghost in question. Clever musical references as well as
humorous asides, ("Agent Scully. Agent Mulder.") add spice for the
viewer, not to mention outstanding "gotcha" moments and spooky special
effects.
73 out of 87 people found the following comment useful :- Excellent production team, 15 September 2005
Author:
starbuckscout-1 from United States
I saw the pilot last night and was very happy with the production team.
David Nutter, who was involved on the X-Files- hence giving
Supernatural that "X-Files-ish tone" is a fantastic director. He is a
veteran of this field having directed X-Files, Roswell, Dark Angel,
Smallville, Disturbing Behavior, Millennium, etc. One of the producers,
McG, has produced The OC, and has directed both Charlie's Angels
movies. Jared and Jensen are placed in roles they are familiar with,
Jared is playing Sam, a character who seems to be a tougher version of
Dean, his character from the Gilmore Girls. Jensen is playing Dean, a
character who is extremely close to being a human clone of his
sarcastic character from Dark Angel, Alec. Opening a WB show with such
great effects scores big with me- not giving anything away, the special
effects are what Nutter and his team are capable of. Sarah Shahi as a
guest star was icing on the cake. The only problem I see with the show
is the fact that it is not geared towards the main demographic of the
OC and Gilmore Girls (which airs in the time slot before Supernatural)
and it may turn away a group of older viewers who may really enjoy it.
As long as they don't call it the "teen X-Files" or "Buffy meets Twin
Peaks" it will be fine. Trying to make Roswell be the next "Buffy"
ruined the show, and it would be a shame to ruin Supernatural.
78 out of 104 people found the following comment useful :- not bad - looking forward to more, 7 September 2005
Author:
jamiemd from United States
Just saw the preview on Yahoo of the first episode and it was better
than I anticipated. There are a few new series this fall with the same
idea (aliens/supernatural phenomena/mystery encountered by a pair of
sleuths) so it's hard to say if this show will set itself apart.
Remember that "E/R" and "Chicago Hope" were two hospital dramas that
debuted on the same night, at the same time, on two different networks
(if you said "what is Chicago Hope?" then my point is made.) Jared
Padalecki, of "Gilmore Girls," is a familiar face who gets a chance to
toughen up his image a little. The first episode sets up some mysteries
to be solved over the season but also has some immediate gratification.
No spoilers here ~ you'll have to watch it yourself. It's got a bit of
an "X Files" feel to it ~ we'll see in future episodes whether they can
keep the stories as interesting while giving the talented lead actors
something meaty to work with.
Watch it at Amazon
Buy it at AmazonMore at IMDb Pro Discuss in Boards Add to My Movies Update Data
Quicklinks
Top Links
trailers and videosfull cast and crewtriviaofficial sitesmemorable quotesOverview
main detailscombined detailsfull cast and crewcompany creditsepisode listepisodes castepisode ratings... by rating... by votestv scheduleAwards & Reviews
user commentsexternal reviewsnewsgroup reviewsawardsuser ratingsrecommendationsmessage boardPlot & Quotes
plot summaryplot keywordsAmazon.com summarymemorable quotesFun Stuff
triviagoofssoundtrack listingcrazy creditsalternate versionsmovie connectionsFAQOther Info
merchandising linksbox office/businessrelease datesfilming locationstechnical specslaserdisc detailsDVD detailsliterature listingsNewsDeskPromotional
taglines trailers and videos posters photo galleryExternal Links
showtimesofficial sitesmiscellaneousphotographssound clipsvideo clipsIMDb user comments for
"Supernatural" (2005) More at IMDbPro »
253 out of 279 people found the following comment useful :-

Whoa! This is more like it!, 29 September 2005
Author: sarastro7 from Denmark
After being disappointed by mediocre to bad new shows like Threshold and Invasion, I am glad that there's at least one new show that really delivers. Supernatural is in a whole different league, with proper style, suspense and great production values. This is a dark, moody show that understands how to use the television medium. The story isn't exactly complex, but the storytelling technique pulls you in and holds your attention, making you want to know more about the supernatural beings and the rules that govern their shadow world. I'm usually not a fan of darkness and horror, but this show is effective. It's dark urban fantasy and it has the potential to go a long way. As it is, the show is way, waay above average, and I rate the pilot episode an 8 out of 10.
248 out of 272 people found the following comment useful :-

Supernatural is a dream for everyone who loves the horror/suspense genre, 20 September 2005
Author: Kimberly from United States
I personally have been waiting to see a show based on spooky plots and this show delivers. Supernatural is somewhat endearing in that the main characters (the only ones who will be recurring) are brothers, however, the writing makes the characters more believable. They are different from each other, each with their own take on life and things that are not typical. I think as the show goes on it will continue to get better,though it is great now. I can't wait to see more of this show!
Another plus is the little bits of humor placed here and there, which, when done right, is always a plus. Some of the best shows/movies are ones in which one minute you are sitting on the edge of your seat biting your nails and the next you are laughing at some irony or funny statement/joke a character has said. Also, having two very attractive men in the cast doesn't hurt, either ;)
253 out of 282 people found the following comment useful :-

One word: Awesome, 17 September 2005
Author: TruthIsOutThere from United States
During the 90's I was a big fan of the X-Files to this day I still am. The X-Files had great stories and character development, which is needed for a great show. Supernatural has that from the very first episode. I admit that I missed the first 10 minutes of the show, but I knew exactly what happened and where the story was going. Most shows you tune into after the first few minutes your lost and you lose interest, unlike Supernatural. CBS's Threshold, may not live up to the X-Files, but Supernatural does.
One final note, as long as the WB doesn't do any tweaking of the show this series will last for quite a few seasons.
155 out of 202 people found the following comment useful :-
amazing.........totally awesome, 13 September 2005
Author: cool_imran89 from vancouver,canada
When i first saw the trailer of the show, i didn't actually get it. But now that i have seen it i completely get it. I understood completely about the entire story. I didn't know that they(cast) can tell everything that has happened in just 1 hour. Jensen Ackles again did an amazing job for the WB. He had a background of Kansas, which is ironic because he was in Kansas in another hit WB show Smallville. He played the older brother who kind of taking care of his younger brother played by Jared Padalecki. Jared's character was tired of hunting supernatural things. but when his own girlfriend dies the same way his mom died, he decided to hunt that thing. This all happened in the pilot episode. Both brothers are also looking for their father who hasn't returned to them in days. He was on his hunting trip( looking for the thing that killed his wife). This also happened in the pilot episode. I don't know if the time or day of the airing of the show will be changed, but i will watch it every week. The WB has made a wise decision of picking up this show. I recommend to everyone to watch this show. You wont be sorry.
124 out of 154 people found the following comment useful :-
Supergood naturally, 18 April 2006
Author: boo_4ever from Ireland
Supernatural is gonna draw the obvious X Files comparisons so we might as well get them out of the way now. Its stars are an intrepid duo who travel across America encountering all manner of paranormal phenomena and mythological creatures. It has a lot of ex-files staff too which is apparent if you have watch both shows pretty closely.
Supernatural isn't as smart as The X Files , nor is it as cleverly written. The X Files was ahead of the time in many ways and is still unique in others, in that it was a mature drama which took its subject matter very seriously. It managed to blend sci fi and the paranormal skillfully so that you almost didn't notice the seams. Supernatural in a way is like The X Files - lite. It knows what it is and I think is a more focused show then its predecessor. From the get go it lays it out to you that it is situated in a world where ghosts, demons and witches really do exist. Once that is established its on with the show and there is no looking back whereas the X Files constantly had the viewer questioning and thinking about what he was seeing and hearing. Where The X Files was the thinking mans science paper, Supernatural is a camp fire ghost story.
Which is more then fine by me. As a lover of ghost stories myself Supernatural makes for fantastic viewing. Its strongest points are its atmosphere and visual imagery. The storyline surrounding the brothers relationship to their father and to each other is in its fledgling stages and will no doubt become stronger over time. Already though it is fun to watch the interplay between Dean and Sam. being the older brother in a family of two myself I find myself sympathising with Dean. Not just because of that but also because I find his personality something I can relate to. His is very Mulder-like in his often whimsical approach to situations. The other brother Sam I find downright annoying at times with the overplayed teen angst.
As for the story lines themselves this is Supernaturals weakest point. So far in the first series Supernatural has a basic structure which rarely changes - brothers drive into town, weird things (usually deaths) happen, brothers use fake ID's to find out about the demon / witch / ghost just in time to save the Hot Chick of the Week(tm) wash, rinse, repeat. If it continues Supernatural is in danger of burning out real fast. However in latter episodes there looks to be some sort of mythology developing which should hopefully complicate things. The fathers connection to their mothers death, Sams visions, the Meg demon etc.
Having just criticised the story lines I have to admit I love their themes. Each week focuses on a different legend such as the woman in white, bloody mary, vampires etc. Each handled very well and with a surprising amount of knowledge. You can tell that ghost story telling is a real labour of love for the creators. It also introduces a lot of lesser known legends such as the wendigo, shrika etc. Someone is doing their homework and I cant wait to see what creatures appear in later episodes. The references to other supernatural shows such as the x files and ghostbusters is an added treat for fans of the genre. As is the classic rock soundtrack. My god someone has taste. Its like they reached into my mind and put down all my favourite past times on celluloid. Well the ones that can be viewed by under 18's anyway. I wouldn't say Supernatural has "made scary sexy". I would say its made scary cool again. If only I could be cool again too. Maybe I would be if I had a Chevy Impala too.
All in all an excellent new series dripping with humour, atmosphere and chills. Here's to series two!
105 out of 130 people found the following comment useful :-

This show serves it's purpose, with grace!, 23 October 2005
Author: Josh Hatfield (wr17joshua@vfs.com) from United States
Now this show is not without problems. I'll be the first to admit it. It's very basic premise and sometimes convenient plot turns are not lost on me. Two monster hunting brothers travel cross country and extinguish a different monster each week. Not too much on the original side, I know. However, I can't help but watch this show every week with a fondness for my old junior high days. For those who don't know I was a huge sci-if/horror geek in my younger years and I loved reading about "The Crazy Hook Man who kills Teenagers" or "The Ghost of the Lady in White". I ate those stories up, and apparently so did the show's creator. This show takes me back to the years before I learned what character arcs, and plot contrivances were. It strips that all away and just lets me enjoy what it was like to hear ghost stories. What it was like to get chills down my spine every time I rode down a dark road at night expecting an apparition in white to appear. What it was like to come so close to saying "Bloody Mary" to the mirror and then passing out. There is a likability to this show that can't be ignored, and there's even some great moments with the two main characters Sam and Dean (played quite well by Padalecki and Ackles) but it is that nostalgic feeling above all that brings me back each week.
100 out of 121 people found the following comment useful :-

Excellent Show, 16 October 2005
Author: Bigprisc (LamCui@hotmail.com) from Singapore
I just want to say that I noticed the show because I am a big big fan of Sarah Shahi. And watched the pilot for the same reason. But I am sure glad I did, because I became hooked to it and wished the episodes would come out sooner.
I hate horror/ghost shows, movies or TV. I am just a chicken at heart and cannot stand being spooked. But this show is really refreshing as it does not go for cheap thrills like in so many other horror shows. Instead, it explores the different themes and urban legends. Yes, it might sound clichéd. But it is really interesting for me that they explored the different legends.
The best part is, I can sit thru the whole entire show without haven't my guts jump out at every turn.
True that they need to feature less teen beautiful girls. But at least it doesn't play out like other shows that the leads get to wine, dine and bed the girls in different episodes. Contrary, it is very refreshing to see a show that does not have a boy-girl relationship going on.
I like the writing of the story, it is paced pretty well. I also like the acting, easy and comfortable. But what grabs me most is the high production value they have. great shots and great lighting.
One bad point though... the special effects could be a lot better. And the editor has to take note that the blue screens still can be spotted. Please do a cleaner job in taking out the blue screens.
I like to end saying that I love Sarah Shahi even more now. Because she has led me to a show that is totally worth watching.
91 out of 112 people found the following comment useful :-
Excellent beginning, 18 September 2005
Author: djean60 from United States
I wasn't sure this was going to be a "must see" for me, but the atmospheric lighting, outstanding writing and acting had me from the first.
It doesn't hurt that veteran X-Files director was in charge of the pilot.
Steve Railsback (X-Files' Duane Berry) was seen briefly as the haunted husband of the ghost in question. Clever musical references as well as humorous asides, ("Agent Scully. Agent Mulder.") add spice for the viewer, not to mention outstanding "gotcha" moments and spooky special effects.
73 out of 87 people found the following comment useful :-
Excellent production team, 15 September 2005
Author: starbuckscout-1 from United States
I saw the pilot last night and was very happy with the production team. David Nutter, who was involved on the X-Files- hence giving Supernatural that "X-Files-ish tone" is a fantastic director. He is a veteran of this field having directed X-Files, Roswell, Dark Angel, Smallville, Disturbing Behavior, Millennium, etc. One of the producers, McG, has produced The OC, and has directed both Charlie's Angels movies. Jared and Jensen are placed in roles they are familiar with, Jared is playing Sam, a character who seems to be a tougher version of Dean, his character from the Gilmore Girls. Jensen is playing Dean, a character who is extremely close to being a human clone of his sarcastic character from Dark Angel, Alec. Opening a WB show with such great effects scores big with me- not giving anything away, the special effects are what Nutter and his team are capable of. Sarah Shahi as a guest star was icing on the cake. The only problem I see with the show is the fact that it is not geared towards the main demographic of the OC and Gilmore Girls (which airs in the time slot before Supernatural) and it may turn away a group of older viewers who may really enjoy it. As long as they don't call it the "teen X-Files" or "Buffy meets Twin Peaks" it will be fine. Trying to make Roswell be the next "Buffy" ruined the show, and it would be a shame to ruin Supernatural.
78 out of 104 people found the following comment useful :-
not bad - looking forward to more, 7 September 2005
Author: jamiemd from United States
Just saw the preview on Yahoo of the first episode and it was better than I anticipated. There are a few new series this fall with the same idea (aliens/supernatural phenomena/mystery encountered by a pair of sleuths) so it's hard to say if this show will set itself apart. Remember that "E/R" and "Chicago Hope" were two hospital dramas that debuted on the same night, at the same time, on two different networks (if you said "what is Chicago Hope?" then my point is made.) Jared Padalecki, of "Gilmore Girls," is a familiar face who gets a chance to toughen up his image a little. The first episode sets up some mysteries to be solved over the season but also has some immediate gratification. No spoilers here ~ you'll have to watch it yourself. It's got a bit of an "X Files" feel to it ~ we'll see in future episodes whether they can keep the stories as interesting while giving the talented lead actors something meaty to work with.
Add another comment
Related Links